- Philstar.com
- The Philippine Star
- Pilipino Star Ngayon
- The Freeman
- Pang-Masa
- Banat
- Interaksyon
- Coupons
SUPPORT PHILSTAR
About Us |
Contact Us |
Advertise |
Privacy Policy |
Member Agreement |
Copyright Notice
Copyright © 2026. Philstar Global Corp. All Rights Reserved
X
+ Follow ADMINISTATOR OSCAR SEVILLA Tag
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 341687
[Title] => Notaries take note
[Summary] => It has been over a year and a half since the Supreme Courts 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice took effect. However, a glance at many notarized documents that we have seen from the time the Rules took effect indicate that some notaries either are not yet aware of the new rules or have not been able to comply with them. The purpose of the new rules is to give greater dignity to the position occupied by a notary public. In an article of this length, it will be impossible to discuss all of the changes made by the 2004 Rules. We point out below the more salient changes.
[DatePublished] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135291
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1657065
[AuthorName] => POINT OF LAW By Rolando F. Del Castillo
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
)
)
ADMINISTATOR OSCAR SEVILLA
Array
(
[results] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[ArticleID] => 341687
[Title] => Notaries take note
[Summary] => It has been over a year and a half since the Supreme Courts 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice took effect. However, a glance at many notarized documents that we have seen from the time the Rules took effect indicate that some notaries either are not yet aware of the new rules or have not been able to comply with them. The purpose of the new rules is to give greater dignity to the position occupied by a notary public. In an article of this length, it will be impossible to discuss all of the changes made by the 2004 Rules. We point out below the more salient changes.
[DatePublished] => 2006-06-13 00:00:00
[ColumnID] => 135291
[Focus] => 0
[AuthorID] => 1657065
[AuthorName] => POINT OF LAW By Rolando F. Del Castillo
[SectionName] => Business
[SectionUrl] => business
[URL] =>
)
)
)
abtest
By POINT OF LAW By Rolando F. Del Castillo | June 13, 2006 - 12:00am
Recommended
The House prosecution panel has rejected Vice President Sara Duterte’s claim that the impeachment proceedings had been marred by “bending the law,” saying there’s no reason to halt the Senate trial.
6 hours ago
Vice President Sara Duterte criticized Palace press officer Claire Castro anew, saying she should be professional as she represents President Marcos and the Office of the President.
6 hours ago
The Department of National Defense (DND) follows only “objective criteria and no other standard” in appraising reputation of citizens, Secretary Gilbert Teodoro said as he shrugged off Vice President Sara Duterte’s dare that he name pro-China officials.
6 hours ago
Sen. Panfilo Lacson yesterday called for immediate accountability over dozens of allegedly illegal reclamation projects in the Taguig portion of Laguna de Bay, accusing Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano of harassing state regulators to protect the anomalous multimillion-peso contracts.
6 hours ago
Vice President Sara Duterte challenged Defense Secretary Gilbert Teodoro to identify the government officials defending China on the West Philippine Sea issue, saying even President Marcos might be suspected to be among those being alluded to.
1 day ago
Lotto Aug 7, 2026
EZ2/LVM - 20 7
SUERTRES - 5 6 9
4D LOTTO - 6 9 6 4
6/45 Mega Lotto - 12 6 21 32 25 3
P15,000,000.00
Grand Lotto - 43 51 14 9 11 12
P188,654,045.00
Forex
February 12, 2018
- 12:00 am
- 12:00 am
1$ : P51.66









