Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 655147
                    [Title] => Erroneous but not biased
                    [Summary] => 
Are the rulings of a judge supposedly erroneous and allegedly adverse to a party sufficient proof of bias and prejudice on his part?
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-02-08 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

ABAS AND SALIH

Array
(
    [results] => Array
        (
            [0] => Array
                (
                    [ArticleID] => 655147
                    [Title] => Erroneous but not biased
                    [Summary] => 
Are the rulings of a judge supposedly erroneous and allegedly adverse to a party sufficient proof of bias and prejudice on his part?
                    [DatePublished] => 2011-02-08 00:00:00
                    [ColumnID] => 133340
                    [Focus] => 0
                    [AuthorID] => 1804883
                    [AuthorName] => Jose C. Sison
                    [SectionName] => Opinion
                    [SectionUrl] => opinion
                    [URL] => 
                )

        )

)

abtest

Erroneous but not biased

By A LAW EACH DAY (KEEPS TROUBLE AWAY) | By Jose C. Sison | February 8, 2011 - 12:00am

Are the rulings of a judge supposedly erroneous and allegedly adverse to a party sufficient proof of bias and prejudice on his part?

Opinion