USAID, after providing major assistance to the health and family planning programs of the country for 36 years, is gradually veering away from contraceptive procurement assistance and helping bolster the countrys self-reliance in health and family planning.
This declaration is from Carina Stover, chief, Office of Population, Health and Nutrition of USAID. Now organizations worry about the foreign agencys withdrawing support for the countrys planning program can be put to rest.
According to Ms. Stover, in cooperation with the Philippine government, the USAID Strategy for 2002-2006 called "Towards Contraceptive Self-Reliance in the Philippines" provides for the gradual reduction of the agencys contraceptive supply assistance, develop a market segmentation scheme where the reduced contraceptive provisions will be used solely for the family planning needs of poor clients who cannot afford to buy their own contraceptives, and a capability-building effort where private facilities and resources will be tapped to meet the contraceptive demand of the better-off segments of the population.
The population of over 80 million will double in 30 years at the current growth rate of 2.36 percent.
On the other hand, rice production in 2002 grew by an average of only 1.9 percent which means more hungry people competing for a decreasing volume of rice.
The Philippine government has emphasized only "natural" methods of family planning or the BBBB (birth spacing through Billings, Basal Temperature and Body signs).
The Department of Healths approved 2003 budget is only P10.68 billion 1.25 percent share of the total budget.
It is the poorest Filipinos (57.1 percent) who are not using family planning because of poor access and ineffective outreach.
Only 20.5 percent of married women say they need family planning but are not using any method.
The main clients of these units are couples who have "unmet needs in family planning." This means they have the number of children they want right now, but do not have the means to postpone or stop having children.
USAIDs strategy said Ms. Stover, is "to foster the provision of affordable quality family planning services and commodities" and "within the context of an increasing population and increasing the countrys prevalence rate."
Ms. Stover emphasized the strategys aim to shifting the burden of providing free services to all, stimulating greater participation by the private and commercial sector to market and sell family planning commodities (like reproductive pills) and services, and providing "more access and choices for low-cost quality family planning methods."
As to whether women belonging to the Classes C and D2 can afford to buy their own contraceptives, Ms. Stovers figures showed that as of 1998, 3.23 million women of reproductive ages (15 to 49 years old) were using effective family planning methods, and that 2.49 percent of them availed of family planning services in the public sector.
Classes C and D2 can actually afford to buy their own contraceptives, said Ms. Stover, "Government s scarce resources should be concentrated on those who cannot pay and who need contraceptives most."
In fact, families which spend on cigarettes and alcohol can very well afford to buy a pack of pills.
She also spoke about expanding and assessing financing schemes, such as PhilHealth, facilitating the growth of social acceptance and demand for family planning, and supporting sustained advocacy efforts targeted to policymakers, the private sector, and other key stakeholders."