They say that their "chorus of discontent" and "profound disbelief" about their current predicament could be traced to their "naïvete" in believing Rockwell managements high-powered advertising brochures and marketing prospectus. They also claim that the skyrocketing costs of operation of the facility, which they say the owners and management of Rockwell describe as "beyond control", are not their (the unit owners) responsibility, and such "added costs" should not be passed to them.
They are asking if the proposed astronomical increases in homeownersfees could have been brought about by management insufficiency, or worse, lack of vision in their financial assumptions and projections. They further say that under this very difficult times, management should immediately cut costs of operation to arrest the galloping high costs of operation. This columnists opinion is that the directors and executives should take the lead in a cost-cutting-initiative by sacrificing and taking "pay cuts" firing inefficient executives, reducing if not eliminating ostentatious and unnecessary electricity bills, and firing excess supervisory and menial personnel.
Regarding the problems "beyond the control of the owners and management", the homeowners interpret these as "financial problems" which the facility owners and management could talk over with their bankers and lenders so they could be given break. Or they can reduce their profits. Or accept a loss because it is their fault and not of the resident unit owners in making faulty financial projections and management operations or decisions. They say that as resident unit owners, they are not contributory to the profit or loss the company, and are merely owners of the units they bought from Rockwell with hard-earned monies.
In fairness, however, to the owners and management of Rockwell, I would be happy to present their side, at the same time, wondering if the homeowners read and understood the fine print of the contracts they entered into and signed in buying their units. They may, from the beginning, have agreed and signed their contracts without reading and understanding them.
Makatis pizza crust, has that thin, rich crust that is prepared by a dough specialist in one end of the restaurant, within view of diners. Our group of seven last week finished to the last crumb the smoked salmon (Salmone Affumicato) that had fresh dill, tomatoes, mascarpono and mozzarella. Then we tried the Fiorentina, topped with spinach, hard-cooked egg, garlic, olives and tomatoes, and then the Prince Carlo, yes, named after Prince Charles and made of parmesan, leeks, rosemary, mozzarella and tomato. For salad, we had Salad Nicoise of tuna, egg, anchovies, capers, olives, mixed leaf salad, fine green beans, potatoes and tomato, which was served with baked dough balls and PizzaExpress dressing. The small boy with us lapped up the Lasagna Pasticciate, made of leaves of pasta with bechamel, cheese, bolognese sauce and parmesan and tomato. For desserts we had Gelati, an exclusive PizzaExpress ice cream, a heavenly chocolates fudge cake and Panna Cotta.
For vegetarians, there are the Margheritam and the Giardinera, which has the freshest slice tomatoes, mushrooms, olives, red peppers, leeks, peas and mozzarella as toppings. The Mushroom pizza is a popular choice, as is the Veneziana which has capers, onions, olives, pine kernels and sultanas.
But the very first PizzaExpress was started by Peter Boizot, a native of Peterborough (UK), who found the offerings of a pizza place in Italy food for body and soul. On March 29, 1965, he opened his first restaurant in Londons Soho District serving the pizza done the way Italians do it, and two years later, opened a branch in Bloomsbury with the help of top designer Enzo Apicella, who is credited with all the restaurants interior design, from the open kitchen to natural light and high quality natural woods and stone for furniture.
The restaurant can seat 150 persons. The lunchtime crowd is good, but when dusk falls, the place teems with yuppies who find the pizza, ambience and friendly staff addictive.