How can our Armed Forces men and their American "trainors" (back-up troops?) tramp through the underbrush and penetrate the jungle with appropriate stealth and efficiency when they have so many journalists underfoot?
First, so many foreign journalists within easy arms reach particularly of the higher-price-fetching Caucasian ("blue seal") variety will be very much of a temptation to the Abus, and their pals, the Pentagon Gang and their parent-outfit, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), to acquire more hostages. As the publicity and international angst generated by the kidnapping by an Islamic terrorist group in Pakistan of The Wall Street Journal correspondent Daniel Pearl has already demonstrated, abducting a "white" newspaperman has even greater propaganda value than that of continuing to hold captive an American missionary couple, Martin and Gracia Burnham. And, probably, the Abus or the MILF, or any "Lost Command" would be able to require a bigger ransom than the $2-million reputedly being demanded for the release of the Burnhams.
But the worst danger of all is that 100 or 150 foreign correspondents bumming around the place, frustrated at not being able to find a "war" (only legal nitpicking and a few Leftist mini-demonstrations), will feel pressured to justify their existence here by desperately knocking together lurid stories larded with local color to mollify their editors and meet the inexorable daily deadline.
One amusing piece produced by Associated Press and which appeared yesterday in The STAR said that "US troops have been told not to kiss in public or discuss religion in Mindanao . . ."
The guidelines, said AP, were included in a seminar held on "cultural sensitivities." The dispatch quoted Social Welfare Secretary Dinky Soliman as revealing the briefing on how to comport themselves "in a manner that will not become a source of tension and irritation for the public" was attended by 30 American soldiers and officers "at the militarys heavily-secured Southern Command headquarters" in Zamboanga. Big deal. I like that bit about "heavily-secured headquarters . . ." Youd think that the Philippine military was more concerned about keeping the Americans safe and secure than in hunting down the Abu Sayyaf.
As for kissing in public, what the heck. Everybody knows that Americans do such thing on a daily basis (theyve seen all those Hollywood movies a zillion times in the cinemas and on cable TV. You know, those flicks in which a guy meets a gal in a bar, or at some party, or on the beach and within minutes theyre naked in bed making out like nobodys business).
Pinoys, whether Christian, Muslim or Lumad, have by now grown familiar with this quaint American form of social intercourse. Sus, some Filipinos even kiss in public, too. Must be that awful US and, lets face it, European influence which has been fast corrupting us moralistic, sexually well-behaved, and upright Asians.
The only recent motion pictures I recall where there was no sex involved, only people shooting each other to pieces, were Black Hawk Down and Behind Enemy Lines. The US combat pilot hero of the latter celluloid epic was too busy running for his life to entertain any fool notions of kissing anything but the ground to escape flying lead and other lethal ordnance.
It was simultaneously published on the editorial page of the NYTs sister-publication the International Herald Tribune yesterday, under the headline, "The Philippine Front of the Terror War Looks Like a Con Game."
Perhaps Kristof is right. Perhaps sending US special forces and other troops to Mindanao on the supposed mission of fighting terrorists is just another scam designed to screw the long-suffering American taxpayers out of hundreds of millions of hard-earned tax dollars. (Poor Uncle Sucker, hes easy prey on this mendacious world for everybody with his hand out, as Kristof would put it. Why those greedy parasites, seems to be the NYT correspondents implications, are just trying to depict those scruffy Abus as Islamic terrorists when theyre nothing but a bunch of kidnapping bandits! And hes even got a Filipino captain to quote as the source of this conclusion.) Makes US President Georgie Bush and our President GMA look like a conniving pair of "con men" (sorry about being gender-insensitive, but "con-persons" doesnt seem to ring right).
"Muslim fighters are sending their wives away, out of respect for American military prowess. Philippine soldiers are angling for new laser targeting gear, out of respect for American technology. And bars are busy recruiting teen-age girls as entertainers out of respect for American libido.
"But weve been had. This new deployment of troops isnt really about fighting international terrorism, as the Bush administration insists and perhaps believes, which may be worse."
"Anyone who comes here to the jungles of Basilan, home to the Abu Sayyaf movement that the United States is supposed to destroy, discovers pretty quickly that the Abu Sayyaf isnt a militant Islamic terror group. Its simply a gang of about 60 brutal thugs.
" It is clear that theyre ordinary criminals, unlike the Taliban, who fought for a cause, said Captain Harold Cabunoc, commander of the Philippine forces at Basilans Camp Cabunbata, where about a dozen US Special Operations troops will soon be based (most of the US troops will stay on safer ground off Basilan). These guys just kidnap for money. Theyre just common criminals.
"In the early 1990s, Abu Sayyaf had aims of carving out an Islamic state in the south of this mostly Roman Catholic country. But Abu Sayyaf soon degenerated into another of the gangs that have made kidnapping one of the Philippines leading service industries.
"The Abu Sayyaf has been asking for $2 million ransom in exchange for a Kansas missionary couple, Martin and Gracia Burnham. There are signs that the United States could be celebrating their release very soon."
Now I must admit that Im very much intrigued by the last sentence above, pronounced by Kristof with the certainty of the initiated. Does this mean that somebody has come up with the demanded ransom payment? Well know soon enough. But a caveat. The Abus have, in the past, proven unpredictable. Lets not join Kristof and the United States in celebrating not just yet.
"In short, Abu Sayyaf has perfected the art of extorting money from foreigners. And now President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo seems to be learning the art as well. She seized upon the opportunity created by Sept. 11 to portray Abu Sayyaf as international terrorists, accepted an offer by President George W. Bush to eradicate them, and promptly won $100 million in fresh military aid.
"I have a grudging admiration for Mrs. Arroyos shrewdness. Perhaps if New York City wants to get the assistance that the Bush administration promised after Sept. 11, it should demand help crushing international terrorists. If the Philippines can get $100 million because of a gang of 60 crooks, think how much New York City is entitled to!
"When I asked Mrs. Arroyo whether Abu Sayyaf really counted as a terrorist group, she acknowledged that in recent years there had been no proven links to Al-Qaeda. It doesnt matter if theyre connected with Al Qaeda, she added, asserting that Abu Sayyaf kidnappers were terrorists because they instilled terror."
I think its unfair of Kristof, in his sharp-edged sarcastic piece, to speak so harshly and sneeringly of GMA. Why, that sanamagan is virtually calling her an extortionist!
When she was the third or fourth person to ring up Mr. Bush in the immediate aftermath of the Twin Tower and Pentagon tragedies to express her condolences and assure the US of Philippine support in the fight against terrorism, I dont believe (do you?) she had any thought of ringing up the cash register in mind. It was a spontaneous gesture, anybody but the most cynical would concede.
Kristof didnt do his homework, as my old editors in the New York Times, Abe Rosenthal and Seymour Topping, and even Joe Lelyveld, used to insist, because, as everybody remembers, the NYT was supposed to be "the newspaper of record", immortalizing for the historical record "all the news thats fit to print." (In contrast to the popular tabloid in which I had done my "cadetship" on a Joseph Medill Patterson award, the New York Daily News, where Queen Elizabeth II was often referred to as "Liz", and the motto appeared to be, "All the news that fits, we print".)
The truth is that the US State Department and the US government in an advisory compiled before Sept. 11 had already classified the Abu Sayyaf (in a list of 30 or so others) as a "terroristic" group. In those days, being a terrorist wasnt regarded as quite as villainous as it has become since the shocks of the terrible Tuesday in September, when America was caught napping by a bunch of Arab terrorists it had previously underestimated. (This writer was in San Francisco on Sept. 11, then flew on to New York City four days later when the airports were reopened, to visit Ground Zero. The information about the "advisory" appeared, if I remember right, in the NYT itself, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the Washington Post.)
After all, the Americans thought that the danger had diminished when the unsuccessful Feb. 23, 1993 World Trade Center "bomber", Ramzi Yousef, was caught in Pakistan, tried in the US and sentenced by US Judge Kevin Duffy to 240 years in prison on February 12, 1997. (Yousef is now in a Colorado prison, in solitary confinement and denied any visitors except his attorneys.)
Before he was sentenced, if youll recall, Yousef had declared in court: "Yes, Im a terrorist and Im proud of it!"
And here are Judge Duffys words in sentencing Yousef. The judge asserted: "Ramzi Yousef, you are not fit to uphold Islam. Your God is death. Your God is not Allah. You worship death and destruction . . ." Duffy condemned the "sneak attacks which sought to kill and maim totally innocent people."
Who would have believed, in that dramatic moment, that the same network of terrorists would hit the World Trade Center again this time with stultifying and shocking results?
Here are Judge Duffys final words in sentencing Yousef: "When you arrived in this country you immediately recruited a group to your evil plans. When you went to the Philippines you brought still others into your adoration of evil. Starting from nothing, you have shown you an quickly put together those whom you believe are necessary to carry out your nefarious plans. Obviously, you converted them from Allah to evil."
Duffy uttered those words in 1997, when not even GMAs immediate successor, Joseph Estrada, had become President.
Who in the Philippines did Yousef train when he was in Basilan, before he flew on to Manila to organize more cells in the network of terrorist "sleepers" he mobilized here even as he hatched his so-called Bojinka Plot?
Incidentally, the subtitle of the book was: Ramzi Yousef, Osama bin Laden and the Future of Terrorism.
Reeve had written on pages 71 to 73 that "a group of militant Saudi businessmen visited Pakistan in the middle of 1994 and had meetings with associates of Yousef and bin Laden . . . The relationship between Yousef and bin Ladens organization slowly blossomed. Pakistani intelligence sources believe bin Ladens senior officers asked Yousef to travel to the Philippines a country he had visited before the World Trade Center bombing to help Abu Sayyaf, a vicious local Muslim terrorist group already patronized by bin Laden and known to Yousef. Yousef bade farewell to his wife and friends and flew from Pakistan to Malaysia, then travelled by boat to the city of Zamboanga in the southern Philippines, and took a ferry for the 90-minute crossing to Abu Sayyafs secret base on the small island of Basilan in the Sulu Sea, 550 miles south of Manila."
Continued Reeve: "Osama bin Laden believed that an armed insurrection in the south by Abu Sayyaf and thousands of Islamic militants could lead to the creation of a separate independent Muslims state, and through his lieutenants he was funding Abu Sayyaf and encouraging the groups expansion . . . Bin Laden asked Yousef to train men from the Abu Sayyaf in the use of sophisticated high explosives. He spent several weeks on Basilan, travelling into the remote, hilly interior of the island to witness small-arms training, and taught his extraordinary bomb-making skills to more than 20 Abu Sayyaf terrorists in safehouses in and around Isabela, the provincial capital."
A more recent book, post-Sept. 11, Peter L. Bergens HOLY WAR, INC. or Inside the Secret World of Osama bin Laden (The Free Press, New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Singapore, 2001) describes Ramzi Yousef ("whose family are Baluch, Pakistanis," but was "brought up in Kuwait") as a "one-man global jihad. Bergen, the CNNs terrorism analyst, said Yousefs "terrorism career took him to Afghanistan, New York, Thailand, the Philippines, and Pakistan."
Went on Bergen: "Yousefs terrorist plots against the West culminated in plans for blowing up a dozen or so American passenger jets, assassinating Pope John Paul II, and crashing a plane into CIA headquarters in Virginia. The plots were discovered when Filipino police found their outlines on his laptap computer in his Manila apartment in 1994 and subsequently interrogated one of Yousefs co-conspirators, who supplied the details of the plan the terrorist code-named Bojinka."
When Yousef was finally captured in Pakistan in 1995, Bergen recalls a chilling anecdote FBI agents flew him back to New York. "The helicopter that would take Yousef to his American jail cell in Manhattan flew past the World Trade Center, and one of the agents commented that the towers were still standing. They wouldnt be if I had enough money and explosives, came the reply."
If at first you dont succeed, as the old adage goes, try, try again.
But what the heck. Dont apologize or backpedal, Mr. Kristof. We can live without it. Sure, like Pakistan, Uzbekistan, the newly-liberated Afghanistan under the admirable interim leader Hamid Karzai (but will he last?) we Filipinos may indeed be screwing the long-suffering US taxpayers.
Its not a good sign, however, when a Superpower is regarded as so unpopular and so gullible that it has to buy "friends."