MANILA, Philippines – With more than half of the country’s population dwelling in cities, the League of Cities of the Philippines said the delivery of social services will be severely affected in the cityhood bid of 16 towns.
In a press briefing during the National General Assembly of the LCP in Century Park Hotel in Manila today, Alaminos Mayor Hernani Braganza, secretary-general of the LCP, said around P3.7 billion will be slashed from the internal revenue allotment (IRA) of the existing 122 cities.
He said an average of P20 million will be deducted from the IRA of the LCP cities, with Puerto Princesa in Palawan suffering the biggest cut at P200 million.
“Of course it will affect the services that we render to our constituents and to nearby towns which are also enjoying the cities’ services,” he said.
He added that the decision of the Supreme Court, validating the cityhood of 16 towns, will result to the loss of jobs of more than 11,000 workers.
Puerto Princesa Mayor Edward Hagedorn also feared the effect of the recent ruling, saying their development programs could not be pursued on the “yearly flip-flopping of the SC.”
“Kailan matatapos ito? Hindi kami makagawa ng definite development programs, fearing that the SC will again change its decision,” he said, explaining that his city is mostly dependent on the government-appropriated revenue funds.
“We appeal for reconsideration on the decision, as Puerto Princesa’s incomes are mostly base on the IRA and we will severely suffer from the decision,” he reiterated.
For his part, San Fernando Mayor Oscar Rodriguez, national president of the LCP, cited that they are not preventing the conversion of 16 towns “provided that they qualify in the provisions of the Local Government Code”.
Under the law, the three requirements for a town’s cityhood are P100 million locally generated earnings; at least 150,000 populations; and 10,000 hectares land area.
But despite the failure of the 16 towns to meet the requirements, the SC ruled on the constitutionality of their cityhood conversion, added Rodriguez.
“We are not preventing them, provided that they meet the qualifications,” he pointed out, adding that while the per capita expenditure of the 16 towns will improve, those of the 122 cities will shrink.
The city mayors, together with their supporters, will conduct another protest rally at the SC tomorrow, as they file their motion for reconsideration, asking for another reversal on the latest ruling of the High Tribunal.
The squabble on cityhood ruling erupted anew when the SC issued a decision last Feb. 15, declaring the conversion of 16 towns as constitutional. But it has been the third “flip-flop” of the Higher Court since it issued the first decision in 2008.
On its first ruling, the SC declared the cityhood laws as unconstitutional in November 2008. But the LCP filed a motion for reconsideration, convincing the Higher Court to declare it constitutional in December 2009.
It again ruled that the cityhood laws were unconstitutional in August 2010, and lately reversed it as constitutional last February.
In 2007, Congress declared the conversion of 24 towns into cities. In the process of court litigations, eight municipalities withdrew its intention to be converted.
Only 16 towns were left, namely, Baybay (Leyte); Bogo (Cebu); Catbalogan (Samar); Tandag (Surigao del Sur); Borongan (Eastern Samar); Tayabas (Quezon province); Lamitan (Basilan); Tabuk (Kalinga); Bayugan (Agusan del Sur); Batac (Ilocos Norte); Mati (Davao Oriental); Guihulngan (Negros).