Districts have different needs, Lacson says of P100M for lawmakers' projects

MANILA, Philippines — Sen. Panfilo Lacson has expressed disapproval over the P100 million allocated for each member of the House of Representatives in the proposed 2020 national budget.

Rep. Joey Salceda (Albay), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, earlier said 70% of the fund allocation would go to infrastructure while the remaining 30% would be for bankroll soft projects.

Lacson, meanwhile, said allocations for each lawmaker should be based on needs and priorities.

"By their own admission at least

ni Rep. Salceda, P100 (million) per congressman, it won't sit well with us,

sa

akin particularly, because

hindi

dapat pare-

pareho

ang allocation

sa districts," Lacson said.

(By their own admission, or at least of Rep. Salceda, the P100 million per congressman won't sit well with us. Particularly with me because districts shouldn't have equal allocations) 

The senator added that some districts need more than others do.

"Bakit mo

gagawin equal ang distribution

ng infrastructure and even soft projects na P70 million

ang infra and soft 30 million,

mukhang

hindi

tama," the senator said.

(Why make the distribution for infrastructure proejects equal at P70 million and even 'soft' projects at P30 million. That doesn't seem right)

"Soft" projects, in contrast to "hard" ones like roads and buildings, include scholarships, social services and training programs. 

'Pork battle' on again

Lacson has also declared a "pork battle" as the Senate has yet to approve its own version of the proposed budget for next year.

The yearly “pork battle” is on. Gloves are off once more. It’s time to lose some friends and create more enemies. I’ll be busy blocking trolls again. I never learn.

— PING LACSON (@iampinglacson) September 24, 2019

Salceda earlier said the allocated P100 million per lawmaker in the proposed budget is not "pork barrel," which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. The court, in its 2013 ruling on pork barrel, held that "the defining feature of all forms of Congressional Pork Barrel would be the authority of legislators to participate in the post-enactment phases of project implementation," which it deemed illegal.

According to Salceda,

the P70 million per lawmaker for infrastructure were itemized under the National Expenditure Program, the basis of the General Appropriations bill.

"It is

pork-free based on Supreme Court standards. And the mere fact

that there were no new insertions," Salceda earlier said. — Patricia Lourdes Viray