Suffrage: Tool to eradicate corruption

In business, to safeguard company’s assets, internal control system is established and made sure to be adequate.  To ensure success, the internal control system is structured to have both basic and supervisory controls.  With this in mind, the company’s organizational structure is so designed that each person does not handle incompatible functions.  It is established in a way that the internal control’s cardinal rule of segregation of duties is well observed and checks and balances are assured.  On top of these, most companies made it a policy that their personnel are rotated periodically to ensure that the work of another person shall be reviewed and accountabilities established upon turnover.  To some extent, some companies even make it a policy to have unannounced leaves or forced leaves on custodians of funds or those with influences over some company funds just to make sure that should anomalies exist, they could no longer tamper evidences.

The same should have been true (or even more) in public service.  This is so, because what these public servants deal with are publicly-owned funds or our money.  But with a congress and, worst, local government units ran like family-owned corporations by our government leaders (who have made sure their family members are in key positions, whether by election or appointment), the internal control aspect of governance is set aside.  Consequently, corruption pervades and has remained unabated. 

Truth to tell, this concern was, in fact, recognized in our 1987 constitution as it explicitly states in Article II Section 26 that, "The State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service, and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law”.  However, despite this constitutional prohibition and strong clamors for change in the country’s political landscape, huge clans have continued to grow not only in numbers and in strength but territories as well.  As it seems, though prohibited by our constitution, the enabling law will not certainly see the light of day unless the dynastically-dominated legislative chambers turn suicidal and pass it.  Thus, in the absence of such law, their (political dynasties) fate in every election rest on a “telenovela-enamored” and seemingly parasitical population that pervasively decide solely on the candidates’ popularity, and, to some extent, the political clans’ dubious generosity and vote-buying capability.  Obviously, therefore, they shall stay.

Truth to tell, to these political clans, they’ve made their elective positions their businesses or livelihoods to bank on.  Thus, just like any businesses, they pass it on to their future generations.  Unlike privately owned businesses, however, their hold of such devious inheritances is perpetuated at our expense.  How?  The answer is so simple.

First and foremost, it breeds cronyism or nepotism.  History tells us what happened then when Pres. Marcos had Danding Cojuangco ruled the coconut industry and Roberto Benedicto, the sugar industry.  Then, both industries were in a mess and the wealth was just concentrated on the few elite, the cronies.  Thus, the economy was in shambles and the rest of us have become unwilling paupers.  Moreover, it begets nepotism.  Nepotism is generally define as favoritism shown or patronage granted to relatives or close friends by those with power or influence as in politics or business.  Notably, even family corporations abhor nepotism because of its disadvantages.  First, it denies the business of highly qualified individuals that are really fit for the job.  Secondly, when relatives are placed in incompatible functions, internal control is compromised.  Inarguably, these instances are both unhealthy for the business.

If political dynasties won’t thrive, corruption shall not flourish.  Take the case of Pres. Arroyo.  Obviously, because Pres. Arroyo’s bet did not win the last presidential election, no one in Malacañang, therefore, can conceal her shenanigans.  Thus, she is spending time on “house or hospital arrest”.  Similarly, the Province of Cebu has its own share of potentially spurious deals, the Balili Property acquisition and the CICC construction, among others. If the Garcia’s dynasty discontinues, they will no longer be in the position to conceal or tamper evidences.  Thus, we can bear witness to a full-blown investigation of these “suspiciously anomalous” deals. 

Indeed, as politicians (from dynasties) and their cohorts (cronies and relatives) deceitfully siphon money from the government’s treasury through illegitimate deals, the economy is starved with it.  Therefore, let us not give them the opportunity to eternally stay and be in a position to steal conveniently and conceal perpetually.

For your comments and suggestions, please email to [email protected].