MANILA, Philippines – The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which falls under the Bank for International Settlement (BIS), is waiting for feedback on the consultative document on trading book capital requirement it released recently.
According to The Asian Banker, the proposals will strengthen capital standards for market risk, and thereby contribute to a more resilient banking sector.
The consultative document sets out a revised market risk framework and proposes a number of specific measures to improve trading book capital requirements. The Basel Committee wants to achieve a regulatory framework that can be implemented consistently by supervisors and which achieves comparable levels of capital across jurisdictions.
Key elements of the proposals include:
• A more objective boundary between the trading book and the banking book that materially reduces the scope for regulatory arbitrage - feedback is sought on two alternative approaches;
• Moving from value-at-risk to expected shortfall, a risk measure that better captures “tail risk”;
• Calibrating the revised framework in both the standardized and internal models-based approaches to a period of significant financial stress, consistent with the stressed value-at-risk approach adopted in Basel 2.5;
• Comprehensively incorporating the risk of market illiquidity, again consistent with the direction taken in Basel 2.5;
• Measures to reduce model risk in the internal models-based approach, including a more granular models approval process and constraints on diversification; and,
• A revised standardized approach that is intended to be more risk-sensitive and act as a credible fallback to internal models.
Comments on the document should be submitted by Sept. 7, 2012 by e-mail to baselcommittee@bis.org. Alternatively, comments may be sent by post to the Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, BIS, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Once the committee has reviewed responses, it intends to release for comment a more detailed set of proposals to amend the Basel III framework. In line with its normal process, the committee will also subject such proposals to a thorough quantitative impact study.
Meanwhile, the committee also plans to strengthen the relationship between the models-based and standardized approaches by establishing a closer link between the calibration of the two approaches, requiring mandatory calculation of the standardized approach by all banks, and considering the merits of introducing the standardized approach as a floor or surcharge to the models-based approach.
Furthermore, the treatment of hedging and diversification will be more closely aligned between the two approaches.
In July 2009, the committee issued revisions to the market risk framework as part of the “Basel 2.5” package. These revisions substantially increased capital requirements for trading activities, particularly for securitizations and structured credit products, recognizing the substantial losses incurred by banks during the financial crisis.
However, Basel 2.5 largely built on the existing regulatory definitions and framework.
At the same time, the committee commenced a fundamental review of trading book capital requirements. “Its intent has been to comprehensively evaluate the overall design of the market risk regulatory regime as well as weaknesses in risk measurement under the framework’s internal models-based and standardized approaches,” the prestigious financial publication said.
This consultative document sets out a revised market risk framework and proposes a number of specific measures to improve trading book capital requirements.
These proposals reflect the committee’s increased focus on achieving a regulatory framework that can be implemented consistently by supervisors and which achieves comparable levels of capital across jurisdictions.