It is once again the season for political parties, colorful placards, balloons, and creative jingles. Yes, the Philippines is entering another era of selecting its next set of leaders. This time, it is especially crucial for local government units, whose terms last only three years. In that short span, some may find the period too brief to implement concrete programs. They often need another term to complete their plans, provided they don’t encounter any obstacles along the way. What is particularly intriguing in Cebu is the two dismissal orders faced by two local chief executives.
In Cebu City, Mayor Michael Rama was found guilty of nepotism and grave misconduct for hiring his brothers-in-law as casual employees in the Cebu City Hall. Meanwhile, in Mandaue City, Mayor Jonas Cortes faced similar charges for allowing the operation of a concrete batching plant despite the lack of a business permit, sanitary permit, and environmental clearance. While these cases merit thorough investigation, the timing raises questions.
It seems that the Ombudsman is actively responding to cases lodged with their office. However, many are wondering why these actions are occurring just as the polls are approaching. Speculations abound that there may be political motives behind the Ombudsman’s decisions, suggesting a manipulative influence on this supposedly-independent office. Others argue that those who oppose the seated officials are bound to face consequences. I sincerely hope this is not true.
The image of this quasi-judicial body now appears tainted, but I still hold on to a glimmer of faith that they are fulfilling their mandates with integrity. However, if this is the case, then all other local government units should also be subjected to scrutiny. For instance, the nature of the case against Mayor Rama is not unique to Cebu City; other offices might be engaging in similar misconduct, only that no one has been vigilant enough to report it. Regarding the environmental complaint lodged against Mayor Cortes, there are numerous harmful private companies evading accountability for their actions. In fact, a recent movement has emerged to save Tañon Strait from a proposed coal power plant. Aren’t the government offices overseeing these institutions also liable? It is simply unfair to play favorites.
As the deadline for filing certificates of candidacy approaches, more colorful stories will undoubtedly emerge. We are yet to discover who is willing to dedicate themselves to public service. However, the intent must go beyond mere photo opportunities in front of the Commission on Elections. Genuine public service requires a track record, relevant experience, and visibility within the community. In 2025, we must steer the direction toward a better Cebu as we continue to grapple with various challenges. These issues are perennial --traffic congestion, environmental concerns, disaster resilience, and many more. Our collective voice and actions can drive meaningful change, paving the way for a brighter future for Cebu and its residents. There are no other words to express it: we deserve the best.