CEBU, Philippines — The Philippine Chamber of Agriculture and Food Inc. (PCAFI) has asked the presidential candidates, if and when they get elected, to put agriculture sector as a priority investment venue given its significant contribution to the economy.
This is to further highlight the private sector’s call to the government to plow in investments into agriculture sector that drives economic development even as private enterprises pour in the bulk of 95 percent of investments in agriculture while government only contributes five percent to farm output.
“The private sector contributes 95 percent of the investment in the agriculture sector. It should be provided with the right environment for people to invest in it. Government contribution to the total agricultural output is less than five yearly,” according to PCAFI President Danilo V. Fausto.
Also proposing recommendations through the online forum are Alyansa Agrikultura Convenor Ernesto Ordonez and Federation of Free Farmers Chairman Leonardo Q. Montemayor.
After long years of ignoring the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act of 1997 (AFMA-Republic Act 8435), government should now implement it, Montemayor said.
The AFMA-mandated Naitonal Information Data System (NIDS) should be put up to provide an accurate data on import, export, demand, supply, and prices of agricultural commodities. Such data is not provided by the Philippine Statistics Authority.
Creation of the NIDS is critical so that excessive importation of agricultural goods that has been slowly killing the agriculture sector can only be resolved given accurate data.
“Investors and food producers will have an informed business decisions (given this data),” said Fausto.
Five percent of the country’s agricultural land is planted with just four crops--rice, corn, banana and coconut.
Income from these crops traditionally planted on 1 to 2 hectares of land cannot adequately feed a family of five members.
“Our small farmers can earn more by planting other crops (through intercropping) with greater value like vegetables, legumes, fruits and even ornamentals in rotation with rice and corn. Farm produce can be further processed into various products far more valuable than the raw form and create additional employment in the process,” he said.
Importation has become the Department of Agriculture’s (DA) long prevailing system in ensuring food security, hurting many Filipino farmers. Thus, PCAFI has asked for the implementation of laws to curb importation that only benefit importers and traders.
The Safeguard Measures Act (SMA-- Section 13, RA 8800) indicated that “in reaching a positive determination that the increase in the importation of the (imported) product is causing serious injury or threat directly to competitive (local) products,” an increase in duty on the imported product may be imposed.
The SMA also provides that if importation poses threat on the local industry, a decrease in the quota (minimum access volume or MAV) on the product may be implemented. MAV is an importation program that carries lower tariff rate.
“The initiation of international negotiations to address the underlying cause of the increase of imports of the product, to alleviate the injury or threat thereof to the domestic industry (should be done),” according to the PCAFI position paper.
RA 8751 is the law that sanctions imposition of countervailing duties on imported subsidized products “in order to protect domestic industries from unfair trade competition.”
Whenever any product is “granted directly or indirectly by the government in the country of origin” any kind of subsidy upon its production, and importation of such product causes material injury to a domestic industry, countervailing duties must be imposed.
RA 8752 also provides that anti-dumping duty may be imposed whenever any imported product has a price less than its “normal value” and causes threat to a domestic industry.