Save our children vs. BPA

Yes, Christmas is for children. It’s about a babe born in a humble manger thousands of years ago, when chemical poisoning was unheard of. Indeed, today’s children are an endangered lot. There’s the issue of toxic lead in children’s toys. Prolonged exposure to lead can affect a child’s development, causing learning and coordination problems. Then there’s melamine in infant formula from China (melamine is added to make it appear that the milk has a higher protein content). Melamine can cause kidney stones; it has killed some children in China and landed thousands of babies in hospitals. Both scary issues are still fresh in most parents’ minds. A frantic cry for help reverberates around the world.

And now, parents and advocates of children’s health and chemical safety are combining their angry voices and urging prompt precautionary action against the continued use of bisphenol A (BPA) in infant and other consumer products. A staunch advocate of breastfeeding and children’s health aptly called Aruga and EcoWaste Coalition, an avid campaigner against hazardous chemicals, have joined hands to call on the authorities to act quickly to safeguard public health from exposure to BPA. The public interest groups urged the Department of Health to issue without delay a health advisory that will inform consumers about the hazards of BPA to human health, especially for developing fetuses and newborns. After the melamine-tainted milk crisis that shook the world, new studies have rekindled concern over BPA, a synthetic chemical compound that is widely used in the manufacture of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins for lining metal cans. Polycarbonate plastics such as baby feeding bottles, reusable water bottles, pitchers, storage bottles, tableware, and food containers carry the recycling symbol #7 and are sometimes marked “PC.”

Warns Ines Fernandez of Aruga,“The leaching of BPA, an endocrine disruptor, from polycarbonate feeding bottles can result in serious developmental and reproductive disorders. Such a toxic threat to babies provides another compelling reason why mothers should breastfeed and shun artificial breastmilk substitutes.”

For its part, the EcoWaste Coalition, which has recently launched a campaign vs. hazardous chemicals, believes that the new studies should push policymakers into adopting a precautionary ban on BPA-contaminated products. “Let us heed the early warnings from the numerous studies on the toxic health effects of BPA, particularly to fetuses, babies, and children who are most vulnerable to injuries from hazardous chemicals. It is our collective responsibility to take precaution now by banning BPA and promoting ecological alternatives to eliminate harm,” says Sonia Mendoza of the Mother Earth Foundation, a member of the EcoWaste Coalition.

The journal Sentinel, published in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, released last Nov. 20 a report from a study it commissioned showing that “microwave-safe” meals and containers, including plastic baby feeding bottles, baby formula, and baby food, leached toxic doses of BPA when heated (check it out at www.jsonline.com/watchdog/watchdogreports/34532034.html). The said study has reportedly spurred state and federal lawmakers in the US into calling for the eradication of BPA from food and beverage containers.

Also recently, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine reported three new studies linking BPA exposure to impaired fertility in both women and men, qualifying that the findings need to be further examined. These studies, the EcoWaste Coalition points out, should inform the process being facilitated by the Department of Trade and Industry towards the identification and phase-out of non-environmentally acceptable products and packaging materials as required by Republic Act 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000.

In the absence of a BPA ban in the Philippines, the groups recommend the following consumer tips to prevent or reduce exposure to this toxic chemical:

• Nourish your child with breastmilk, the most complete and ecological food. Go for exclusive breastfeeding for six months and continue breastfeeding for two years and more.

• Refrain from using polycarbonate plastic containers; use safer alternatives such as glass, ceramics or stainless steel.

• Avoid microwaving food and beverage in plastic or plastic cling wraps.

• Reduce consumption of canned foods as can liners may contain BPA; opt for natural food or food stored in safer containers.

• Check the product labels and select the ones that say “BPA-free.”

“Pursuant to the goals of the Strategic Approach on International Chemicals Management (SAICM), we urge the government to act decisively and protect the most vulnerable members of our society from BPA contamination,” the groups enjoin authorities.

SAICM refers to the international policy framework that governments, including the Philippines, adopted in Dubai in 2006 to ensure that chemicals are used and produced in ways that no longer pose significant harm to public health and the environment.

“What will happen to the next generation if babies now become infertile because of the adverse effects of the hazardous chemical BPA found in plastic bottles and tin cans? Who will continue the Filipino society?” the groups pose this ticklish question.

Can you imagine Christmas without children?

* * *

We’d love to hear from you. E-mail us at ching_alano@yahoo.com.

Show comments