Government, despite its avowed devotion to our farmers and fishermen, has failed again. And Agriculture Secretary Cito Lorenzo is not a happy man; likewise the farmers and fishermen. Its the pits once again for them.
The agriculture secretary pointed out that the 2004 DA budget is at its lowest in real terms if one takes into account inflation. The Department of Agriculture (DA) will allot 28 percent or P4.2 billion of its budget for regular expenses, while the remaining 72 percent equivalent to about P11.2 billion will be for the implementation of AFMA.
This was never realized. Since 1998, a year after AFMA became law, the regular DA budget was just P15.73 billion. If AFMA was strictly observed, DA should have gotten P35.73 billion.
The DA is now pressing Congress to fast track legislation of its proposal to extend the lifespan of the AFMA, the key DA program to sustain growth in the agriculture sector, for another five years when it expires in 2005.
But what good is the AFMA extension if the much needed funding is not made available?
If only government heeded this WTO measure meant to enhance our agricultural global competitiveness, the DA should have gotten P51 billion in 1999, as the GVA contribution of the agri-fishery sector totaled P506 billion.
Instead, DA was allocated just P15 billion in 1999 which was 58 percent leaner as per AFMA, and only three percent of the farm sectors GVA.
What happened to the P36 billion that should have been used to provide support to the agricultural sector and prepare it for global competition?
Since AFMAs implementation, the sector has yet to receive an additional P20 billion in order to modernize the agriculture and fishery sectors.
Thailand also invests heavily in the agriculture sector, appropriating a regular budget of 55 billion baht and another 25 billion baht for farm enterprises and infrastructure. This translates to about P111.2 billion.
Furthermore, another 200 billion baht is set aside for debt moratorium that provides relief for farmers for at least three years. This does not even include revolving funds put up to prop up Thailands agriculture in the rural sector.
In contrast, the Philippine agriculture sector gets approximately $305 million yearly (P15.4 billion this year) that translate to a pitiful $10 to each Filipino farmer. Mendicants in the streets would probably get more in a year.
And worse of all, the government is short-changing the agri sector of funds committed by law for its use to develop and be more productive and competitive. Our farmers and fishermen are, therefore, deprived of opportunities to break out of the bondage of poverty.
Calling the attention of candidates aspiring to be leaders of our country: heed the call for more attention to the agriculture sector woes, or well have millions of hungrier Filipinos at the core of a social volcanic eruption.
Is too much politics making Shell ambivalent about its plans in the Philippines? Is the closure of another refinery, that of Shell in Tabangao, Batangas, imminent? What is the impact of the much-ballyhooed Malampaya natural gas in the Philippine energy sector? What is holding back Shells plans to pursue development of the oil deposits found in the Malampaya natural gas field?
Join us break barriers and gain insights into the views of the country chairman of the Shell companies in the Philippines on the varied issues affecting the oil industry and Philippines business in general. Watch it.
Should you wish to share any insights, write me at Link Edge, 4th Floor, 156 Valero Street, Salcedo Villa
ge, 1227 Makati City. Or e-mail me at reygamboa@linkedge.biz. If you wish to view the previous columns, you may visit my website at http://bizlinks.linkedge.biz